Abrams says that as a deconstructive angel Hillis Miller is not serious, as in Hegel's sense of the term, that is, he does not entirely and consistently commit himself to the consequences of his premises. He is a double agent who plays the game of language by two very different sets of rules. One of the games he plays is that of a deconstructive critic of literary texts. The other is the game he will play in a minute or two when he steps out of his grapho centric premises and begins to talk. Abrams makes a prediction as to what Miller is going to do in the symposium. He will have determinate things to say and will masterfully exploit the resources of language to express there things clearly and forcibly. He will present things without any theoretical difficulties. People who have read and admired his recent writings will be surprised and delighted by peculiarities of what he says. Abrams says that before presenting his speech Miller works his speech in the form of writing. He delivers it and then again publishes for the public. This substitution of written from by speech will certainly make a difference. Each of his readers will be able to reconvert the black-on-blanks back to speech, which he will hear in his mind's ear; he will perceive the words not simply as marks nor as sounds, but as already invested with meaning.